Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

US judge signals setback in TikTok’s $400m privacy deal

The proposed payout dwarfs Musical.ly’s $5.7 million FTC settlement from 2019.

US judge signals setback in TikTok’s $400m privacy deal

A California federal judge has tentatively rejected a portion of the U.S. government’s $400 million settlement with TikTok, potentially maintaining oversight of the social media platform, according to Bloomberg. U.S. District Judge George H. Wu denied a request on Friday to void an order originally imposed on Musical.ly, the predecessor to TikTok acquired by ByteDance.

The order pertains to privacy protections for users under the age of 13. Judge Wu stated that neither TikTok nor the U.S. government demonstrated that the obligations under the earlier order were no longer necessary. This ruling could impact a part of TikTok’s $400 million settlement reached in August to address child privacy allegations raised during the Biden administration.

Out of that sum, $100 million was contingent on vacating the earlier consent decree. Judge Wu noted that alterations to TikTok’s ownership structure, compliance measures, and the recent settlement did not demonstrate substantial compliance with the existing order or render its protections obsolete. He intends to retain oversight of TikTok’s privacy practices.

The decision complicates TikTok’s U.S. operations following years of government scrutiny due to the platform’s Chinese ownership. A deal finalized in January between the Trump administration and ByteDance transferred parts of TikTok’s U.S. operations to American investors, seemingly resolving a separate dispute over ownership and operations in the country.

The $400 million privacy settlement in August addressed allegations regarding younger user protections. TikTok and the U.S. Department of Justice did not comment on Bloomberg's requests for comment after business hours. Judge Wu's decision is tentative, with a hearing on the government's request to dismiss the consent decree set for September 21.

Written by urgent.news from Investing.com's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at techinasia.com →

More in Tech

Stop Stashing. Use a Second Working Directory for the Interruption.

"Can you look at the login bug on main? Five minutes." You are forty minutes into a feature, with edits in six files that do not compile yet.

  • Use Git worktrees to manage interruptions, preserving original branch context
  • Create second working directory sharing .git database for feature branch
  • Remove worktree after hotfix merge without affecting main branch

Twelve Commits, One Regression, Four Test Runs: git bisect run

The test fails on main . It passed a week ago. Twelve commits landed in between, most of them documentation, and nobody remembers which one touched the code. You could read all twelve diffs.

  • git bisect tool finds regression-causing commit
  • Requires known bad, known good commits, and test
  • Test determines good/bad outcome, speeds up process

Undo a Git Commit: Two Questions Before You Type Anything

"How do I undo a commit?" has four correct answers and three wrong ones, and the difference is not the command — it is two questions you ask before typing anything: Where is the change?

  • If change is in working tree, use git restore file to revert edit
  • If staged change is unwanted, use git restore --staged file to unstage
  • If committed and not pushed, use git reset --soft HEAD~1 to move pointer

More from Sunday 20 September →