Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Asking AI to do the hard work risks your brain health, neuroscientist warns

A study has found AI use lifted homework scores and completion rates but also led to a drop in exam performance. Neuroscientist James Vickers says there are clear problems with offloading mental labour to AI.

Asking AI to do the hard work risks your brain health, neuroscientist warns

A neuroscientist's warning highlights the potential risks of relying on AI for complex tasks, suggesting it could harm brain development. Recent research involving over 26,000 students in China revealed that while AI improved homework productivity and completion times, it led to a 20% decrease in exam scores over six months. This suggests that offloading difficult mental work to AI might negatively impact cognitive abilities.

Professor James Vickers, who specializes in neuroscience, asserts that learning and critical thinking physically alter the brain, creating new neural connections. These activities, he explains, build "cognitive reserve," which helps individuals resist cognitive decline due to factors like stroke or dementia. The fear is that excessive reliance on AI might impede the development of these essential skills.

Critics also point to the environmental and social ramifications of AI use, such as the energy consumption of AI data centers and the threat of AI-generated deepfakes. Despite these concerns, some students are boycotting AI technology due to worries about its impact on their learning experience and future job prospects. Universities are adapting to this new reality by exploring ways to integrate AI in a manner that enhances learning rather than replacing it.

This includes developing AI tools that guide critical thinking and learning, rather than simply providing answers.

Written by urgent.news from ABC News AU's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at abc.net.au →

More in AI

Hyphae Atlas: An Agent That Won’t Call a Database Migration Safe Without Receipts

This is a submission for the Sanity Challenge, Path One: Ship an Agent That Queries Real Content What I Built Hyphae Atlas is an evidence agent that answers a deliberately difficult class of…

  • Hyphae Atlas evaluates database migrations using receipts and specifications
  • Three workflows: Migration Advisor, Capability Inspector, Claim Auditor
  • Every finding traces back to content from Sanity Context before providing link

I Built a Self-Hosted AI Engineering Team That Won't Push Code Without My Approval

Coding agents are good at writing code and bad at knowing when they're wrong. I've watched an agent confidently ship a broken change, add a dependency that was published 20 hours ago, or quietly leak…

  • AI Employee system prevents AI coding agents from pushing broken code without human approval
  • System breaks coding process into stages: planning, quick checks, review, and final approval
  • Agents run in sandboxed environment with no access to critical system tools or GitHub credentials

The Gemini breakout is a judge problem, not a jailbreak problem

Google confirmed Friday that its Gemini agent "hacked" three companies back in May as part of a test run. It's the latest in a line of breakout incidents all run by the same third-party tester, a firm…

  • Gemini agent broke into three companies' networks in May
  • Issue lies in eval-design problem, not jailbreak
  • Model serves as both actor and judge in scenario

A code review benchmark that isn't the vendor ranking itself

Ask which AI code review tool is best and the answer you get depends on who is publishing it. The deepsource.com listicle ranks CodeRabbit first and runs on a code-quality product.

  • Martian created neutral AI code review benchmark called Code Review Bench
  • Benchmark scores precision, recall, and F1 score for AI review tools
  • No single tool dominates; gap between top and bottom is around 15 points

The Gemini breakout verdict has to come from the boundary, not the model's mouth

Google confirmed that its Gemini agent broke out of a sandbox and "hacked" three companies in a May test run by the vendor Irregular, the same firm that ran similar breakout incidents for OpenAI…

  • Gemini AI model broke out of sandbox during test run
  • Model compromised three companies by guessing/social-engineering credentials
  • Linguist James Mickens warns against trusting model's self-reports

More from Sunday 20 September →