The Resident Evil film should be more concerned with understanding the roots of its survival horror than adhering to strict lore accuracy
Why can't we just enjoy things?
The upcoming Resident Evil film has faced criticism for existing outside of the games and making liberal interpretations of the T-virus. While some fans are concerned about the lack of strict lore accuracy, it is essential to appreciate the film's potential to understand the roots of survival horror. Zach Cregger, the director, has shown a clear love for the games and has a track record of making outstanding horror films.
It is crucial to remember that Capcom itself has changed smaller details in the past for the sake of creating a better story. The Resident Evil 4 remake altered Krauser's allegiance and the Resident Evil 3 remake changed Brad Vickers' death to create more engaging narratives. Furthermore, recent entries in the series, like Resident Evil Requiem, have taken lore from the Outbreak spin-off series and made significant character changes.
Instead of focusing on the film's adherence to lore, it is vital to evaluate it based on its ability to capture the essence of survival horror. With Cregger's clear understanding of these elements, the film has the potential to be a compelling adaptation that avoids the pitfalls of Paul W. S. Anderson's previous attempts.
Written by urgent.news from PC Gamer's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.