Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Health & Medicine

Understanding Fertility Control: Traditional Counting vs Modern Awareness

By: Jennifer Nerkie Kenney Bridget found herself in a dilemma, choosing between a fertility app called Flo and advice from her friends, whom she had always trusted. She decided to go with the advice from friends who egged her to count the days instead of relying on the app’s alerts. When her period failed to […]

Understanding Fertility Control: Traditional Counting vs Modern Awareness

By journalist Bridget, the choice between a fertility app like Flo and the advice of trusted friends led to questions about which method is safer. This dilemma is shared by many women in Ghana who often rely on traditional counting methods for family planning. The approach is grounded in the belief that it is natural and free, but health experts warn that it can result in unintended pregnancies if not fully understood.

Traditional counting generally involves tracking the menstrual cycle by counting days from the start of menstruation, with the belief that the days immediately following are "safe" for sexual activity and a few days in the middle are considered risky. Many women follow the assumption that menstrual cycles follow a fixed 28-day pattern.

However, this method is fraught with limitations, as it lacks scientific grounding and can vary greatly between individuals. For instance, Rose Narh, a 29-year-old trader, followed this method until she became pregnant at 19, leading her to seek formal reproductive health advice. According to the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, about 32% of women aged 15 to 49 use some form of family planning, with 23% using modern methods and 8% relying on traditional methods.

Among sexually active unmarried women, 46% use modern methods and 17% rely on traditional ones. While contraceptive awareness is prevalent, many women still turn to informal or traditional approaches, such as day-counting, as part of their reproductive health strategy. Scientific methods, in contrast, rely on observable biological signs like changes in discharge and basal body temperature, offering a more personalized approach than the generic 28-day counting.

Qualitative research in Ghana reveals that many women do not fully grasp their individual cycle lengths, which can lead to inaccurate identification of fertile periods and reduced effectiveness of calendar-based methods. Dr. Leslie Davis, an OBGYN specialist, highlights that traditional methods often fail due to incorrect assumptions about ovulation timing, which can vary depending on cycle length and individual factors.

He emphasizes the importance of educating women on the limitations and proper use of fertility awareness methods to avoid unintended pregnancies and related health risks.

Written by urgent.news from GBC Ghana's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at gbcghanaonline.com →

More in Health & Medicine

More from Thursday 17 September →