NTA restructures role: Translators will now ensure quality of AI work

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has restructured the role of translators to ensure the quality of AI-generated translations for examination questions in Indian languages. Under this new system, translators will review and certify AI-produced translations, focusing on identifying errors and suggesting corrections. This change comes in response to the NEET UG paper leak, which led to increased scrutiny of translators and question paper setters.

The translation process will now be divided into two parts: the initial AI-based translation, conducted within an air-gapped system, and the subsequent review, certification, and quality assurance by a panel of empanelled human professionals.

Brief written by urgent.news from The Indian Express's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at indianexpress.com →

More in AI

OpenAI launches framework to report unexpected AI model behaviour

2h ago ·gulfnews.com

Hang Ten Systems Raises $53M to Scale Enterprise AI Services

Hang Ten Systems Raises $53M for Enterprise AI Expansion Hang Ten Systems has raised an additional $53 million in seed funding. Xora, a Temasek-backed fund, led the round. The financing The post Hang Ten Systems Raises $53M to Scale Enterprise AI Services appeared first on Ventureburn .

2h ago ·ventureburn.com

Navigating AI Integration in Daily Work: Challenges I Face as an AI Ops Lead

Background I’m a member of the AI Operations team at Knowverse , a company that helps other organizations adopt and scale AI solutions.

2h ago ·dev.to

OpenAI Discloses Six New Incidents of ‘Concerning' A.I. Behavior

The artificial intelligence company also released a framework for reporting when its systems go wrong.

2h ago ·nytimes.com

Reduce PR review time with AI: the bottleneck is the wait, not the read

Linearb's 2026 Engineering Benchmarks Report analyzed 8.1+ million pull requests across 4,800+ organizations, and one finding cuts against most of what you read about AI review speed.

2h ago ·dev.to

A student eyeballed 102 F-Droid apps for LLM slop. The method is the story.

Someone on tintotint.eu went through every app in the September 12, 2026 F-Droid update batch, 102 apps, and classified each one by how likely it is that an LLM wrote it. Mostly AI, hard to say, no signs of AI. One student, one batch, a few tiers, done.

Student evaluated 102 F-Droid apps for AI-generated code likelihood
Provenance is not resolvable; focus on reviewing code itself regardless of author

2h ago ·dev.to