Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
Today, I’m talking with Mustafa Suleyman, the CEO of Microsoft AI. As you’re no doubt aware, the biggest story in tech right now is the spiraling debate about AI safety and regulation. It should come as no surprise that Mustafa has strong opinions on how AI should be built and regulated. Microsoft just published a […]
Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman joins Decoder to discuss the AI safety and regulation debate, revealing his strong stance on how AI should be built and regulated. Microsoft has recently published a 37-page statement called the "Humanist AI Code of Conduct," which outlines the company's principles around AI development and philosophy on issues such as AI consciousness. Mustafa criticizes Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness, pointing out how it fits into the broader alignment debate.
The CEO believes that alignment is not the only solution to ensure AI safety, but rather one important element. He argues that containment is also crucial, as the proliferation of AI technologies should be rapid to benefit everyone. Mustafa asserts that the current progress in AI, driven by more steerable models and complex goal-setting, indicates an improvement in alignment rather than its failure.
However, he questions whether alignment can be 100% safe and explores the potential of containment, emphasizing that technology should be subordinate, controllable, and aligned to serve humanity's best interests.
Written by urgent.news from The Verge's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
