Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

We don’t need AI regulation — leave safety to us, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says

AI isn't some kind of new form of "alien mind," according to Jensen Huang. It's just hardware and software, so safety can be engineered by each AI product maker.

Abstract editorial illustration

Nvidia's Jensen Huang, the founder and CEO, firmly believes that AI should not be subject to new regulations or laws. In his view, AI is nothing more than hardware and software that can be controlled by humans and governed by existing laws. According to Huang, safety is an engineering problem, not a legal one. He argues that the free market will ensure that companies release safe products.

If a company is not confident in the safety of their AI product, they should not release it. Huang emphasizes that innovation and speed should go hand in hand with safe products. Although this perspective may be comforting, it could be an unwise approach to AI safety from a societal standpoint. Existing product liability laws might not fully cover AI-related issues, and industry self-regulation could be a potential solution.

Nonetheless, if Huang truly believes that new AI regulations are unnecessary, it remains to be seen if his influence will prevail.

Written by urgent.news from TechCrunch's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 4 other outlets

Read the original at techcrunch.com →

More in AI

Self-hosting AI code review is a model-placement decision, not a tool decision

When a team says it wants a self-hosted AI code reviewer, the real question is where the model runs, not which repo to clone. The tool is the easy part.

  • Self-hosted AI code reviewer decision hinges on model placement, not tool choice
  • PR-Agent repository on GitHub demonstrates model placement distinction
  • Options include hosted model + self-hosted app, local model + local app

Counting bugs is the hard part of comparing AI review tools

Model benchmarks for code review usually report the same two numbers: how many bugs the tool found, and how many of its comments were actually right. The part nobody can verify is the counting.

  • Verification process crucial in comparing AI review tools
  • Entelligence's benchmark uses double-judge validation method
  • Lack of disclosed labeling process makes precision numbers unreliable

More from Wednesday 16 September →