The government might strip some asylum seekers of their work rights. Here’s why it shouldn’t

The Australian government is reportedly considering restricting work rights for asylum seekers while they appeal visa rejections. This move could have severe consequences for their livelihood and overall wellbeing. Research indicates that early access to work rights and government support significantly improves employment outcomes for asylum seekers in Australia, even after ten years of permanent residency.

Withholding work rights would not prevent asylum seekers from working, but rather push them into unsafe and exploitative employment circumstances. This could create a more vulnerable population reliant on further support. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees all people the right to work, but this right is only partially true for asylum seekers in Australia.

Bridging visas, which are temporary visas, often come with work eligibility conditions that vary based on the specific type of visa. Employment provides financial security, self-realization, dignity, and social connections. Prohibiting work rights among temporary migrants does not deter them from working; instead, it pushes them into precarious and exploitative situations.

Countries without work rights, like the UK, have observed this. Involuntary return or deportation can be delayed or difficult for asylum seekers, especially when foreign governments do not cooperate or provide necessary travel documents. Denial of work rights may increase dependence on welfare support, creating additional burdens on the state or community sectors.

Debates about immigration focus on reducing migration numbers, making asylum seekers a particularly visible group. Any attempt to curtail their rights would align with a history of targeting a small group of migrants. Evidence-based policy suggests providing early access to rights, including work rights, is crucial.