Republican forces Congress to hold impeachment vote for Pete Hegseth
United States Representative Thomas Massie is forcing fellow Republicans to vote whether to impeach Secretary of Defense
On Tuesday afternoon, Republican Representative Thomas Massie spent over an hour on the House floor attempting to initiate an impeachment vote against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The congressman's efforts were sparked by Hegseth's leadership of the Pentagon, which Massie deemed to be in violation of his duties and the rule of law.
Massie's proposal, which involved a 34-page resolution with eight articles of impeachment, alleged that Hegseth had acted in a manner "contrary to his trust as Secretary of Defense and subversive of constitutional government." The resolution claimed that Hegseth posed a threat to civilians and the laws of war, the integrity of U.S. diplomacy, and the Constitution.
The Pentagon defended Hegseth, stating that he had been a "transformative leader for the Department of War." A spokesperson for the Department expressed unity behind Secretary Hegseth's vision and commitment to putting warfighters and America first.
Massie, a conservative known for his constitutionalist views, claimed he had introduced the articles of impeachment to mark President Donald Trump and Hegseth's illegal conduct in history. The articles of impeachment included allegations such as ignoring laws that minimize civilian casualties, administering unlawful wars, ordering extrajudicial killings, suppressing free speech, and kidnapping a sovereign leader.
Massie expressed concern that Speaker Mike Johnson might disrupt Congress and shorten the work period if he discovered Massie's impeachment efforts. The resolution would need to be voted on within two legislative days, or by Thursday, to force Republicans to defend Hegseth ahead of the midterm elections. GOP leaders might cancel the session on Thursday to avoid the vote.
Massie introduced the resolution on Tuesday because it presented the last possible opportunity to force consideration of the privileged resolution before the midterms.
Written by urgent.news from ABC News (US)'s reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.