Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Precursory deformation for the 26 August 2026 Nepal landslide disaster

A new paper (Wang et al. 2026) suggests that the bedrock failure that initiated the Nepal landslide disaster may have displayed measurable precursory deformation. Inevitably, one of the key discussion points in the aftermath of the 26 August 2026 Nepal landslide disaster is whether the failure could have been anticipated. Opinions differ, but a key […]

Precursory deformation for the 26 August 2026 Nepal landslide disaster

A new paper by Wang et al. (2026) indicates that the bedrock failure that triggered the 26 August 2026 Nepal landslide disaster may have exhibited detectable precursory deformation. One of the primary considerations following the disaster is whether the event could have been predicted. Key discussion points involve identifying precursory signs in the days, weeks, or months preceding the failure.

Techniques employed to detect these signals include InSAR, though the challenging terrain on the north face of Langtang Lirung complicates its application. An alternative method involves pixel offset tracking using optical imagery, such as Sentinel-2 satellite data, which can capture movement in more complex environments. A study published in the journal Landslides (Wang et al., 2026) utilized pixel offset tracking to analyze glacier movements in the area surrounding the initial failure.

The researchers compared the motion of the main glacier, unaffected by the landslide, with that of the hanging glacier beneath which the landslide occurred. Initially, both glaciers moved at a consistent linear rate, with the main glacier at a higher velocity compared to the hanging glacier. However, from late 2025 into early 2026, the hanging glacier began to accelerate its movement dramatically.

By the end of the observation period, the acceleration rate had surged from approximately 7.4 meters per year to around 55 meters per year. The authors propose a somewhat unconventional explanation for this behavior, suggesting it may represent a progressive failure of the bedrock, a phenomenon known to display such deformation patterns.

Further analysis, such as plotting the reciprocal of velocity against time, could provide insights into whether this represented a brittle failure mechanism. While this study offers intriguing evidence of precursory signals potentially linked to the initiating bedrock failure, it does not guarantee the predictability of the disaster or the feasibility of developing a reliable warning system.

Written by urgent.news from Eos's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at eos.org →

More in Science

More from Wednesday 16 September →