Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

House to vote on bill to rein in AI data center utility costs

The bipartisan legislation would create a regulatory framework states could adopt to prevent data center-related energy costs from being passed on to consumers.

The US House of Representatives is set to vote on a bipartisan bill aimed at preventing households and small businesses from paying for the power infrastructure needed to support the country's rapidly expanding AI data center industry. The legislation, known as the Ratepayer Protection Act, would require states to consider rules ensuring that large data centers pay the full cost of new electricity generation, transmission and distribution upgrades needed to serve their facilities.

According to Newsweek, the bill, sponsored by Representative Gabe Evans, a Colorado Republican, would define large-load customers as data center facilities with peak electricity demand of 100 megawatts or more. The measure aims to prevent data center-related energy costs from being passed on to consumers.

The bill's supporters argue that consumers should not subsidize the energy needs of large technology companies. The legislation would create a regulatory framework for states to adopt, ensuring that utilities recover the full incremental cost of infrastructure upgrades from large-load customers.

Brief written by urgent.news from CNBC, Newsweek — 2 reports on this story. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at cnbc.com →

More in AI

Turning Japanese press releases (PR TIMES) into an LLM-ready dataset in 5 minutes

If you build anything that needs to understand the Japanese market — competitor monitoring, PR analytics, a RAG assistant for a sales team — you quickly run into a gap: most of the good structured…

  • PR TIMES holds over 100,000 company press releases.
  • Structured data ideal for LLM input without scraper.
  • Free Apify plan enables fast, cheap processing.

Counting bugs is the hard part of comparing AI review tools

Model benchmarks for code review usually report the same two numbers: how many bugs the tool found, and how many of its comments were actually right. The part nobody can verify is the counting.

  • Verification process crucial in comparing AI review tools
  • Entelligence's benchmark uses double-judge validation method
  • Lack of disclosed labeling process makes precision numbers unreliable

Self-hosting AI code review is a model-placement decision, not a tool decision

When a team says it wants a self-hosted AI code reviewer, the real question is where the model runs, not which repo to clone. The tool is the easy part.

  • Self-hosted AI code reviewer decision hinges on model placement, not tool choice
  • PR-Agent repository on GitHub demonstrates model placement distinction
  • Options include hosted model + self-hosted app, local model + local app

More from Wednesday 16 September →