Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Why You Don't Have To Learn The Terminal

I’ve read the article, “ Why Mint's easy graphical interface is the worst thing for your Linux journey ” and I have some counter arguments on the article. The article explains that if you don’t use the terminal which is one of the best features in the linux world, you are hurting your journey of being a linux user. I disagree with that because I believe that you don’t need to learn the terminal.…

In the article titled "Why Mint’s easy graphical interface is the worst thing for your Linux journey", the author argues that using the terminal is essential for a successful Linux experience. However, the writer disagrees with this viewpoint, asserting that learning the terminal is not necessary for everyone. They believe that the key to a successful Linux journey is finding a distro that meets the user's specific needs and preferences.

The writer points out that the best feature of Linux is its uniqueness, with various distributions (distros) tailored to individual users' requirements. Users can easily switch between distros to find one that best suits their workflow. For instance, a gamer may prefer Kali Linux, a Fortune 500 company may opt for SteamOS, while a regular user simply looking for an operating system that works without tinkering might find RHEL or CentOS Stream more suitable.

The writer provides proof of concept by comparing the majority of Windows and macOS users to Linux users. Most Windows and macOS users likely don't utilize the command line or even be aware of its existence. They simply want to get work done without having to battle the operating system. Similarly, many Linux users opt for graphical distros like Linux Mint or Ubuntu because they serve as beginner-friendly distributions for those new to Linux.

These beginner-friendly distros aim to prevent burnout during the transition from Windows or macOS. If one were to present ArchLinux to a complete Linux novice, they would likely abandon it within the first week. Beginner distros exist to alleviate the stress of learning complex distros like ArchLinux, which contributes to Linux's limited user base.

The writer likens this to someone who has used Windows their entire life and suddenly switching to macOS, finding the process difficult due to the differences in operating systems and workflows.

The writer then discusses the positive aspects of graphical distros for the Linux journey. Graeme Peacock, the author of the Yahoo and How-To-Geek articles, claims that embracing harder challenges led him to demanding projects such as Docker, Linux deployments, and full-stack development. However, the writer argues that this is not the case.

They explain that it's how we grow and become better versions of ourselves, as Graeme Peacock stated, "Growth comes only through difficulty." Nonetheless, the writer contends that graphical distros do not cause stagnation. When the writer first started using Linux, they tried Linux Mint, which ultimately made them appreciate Linux more than Windows, especially after Microsoft ended support for Windows 10.

Their curiosity led them to discover companies like Pine64 and Framework, which they would have missed if they remained a Windows user.

In conclusion, the writer supports the idea that graphical distros are progress, not stagnation, for the Linux journey. They emphasize that Linux is an exceptional piece of software. For those who want to familiarize themselves with Linux but are unsure where to start, they recommend beginning with graphical distros before expanding their journey if desired.

Ultimately, the writer stresses that it's up to each individual to decide how they want to begin their Linux experience, whether that be by learning the terminal or not.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

More from Tuesday 15 September →