Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

What to expect at Neo4j’s GraphSummit: Join theCUBE Sept. 24

Enterprises are facing a context problem — and models alone are not enough to solve it. Graph databases, which connect data with intelligent context that models and agents can better understand, are becoming a critical part of application development. Neo4j Inc., a leader in graph technology, is focused on supporting developers with its AI-powered graph […] The post What to expect at Neo4j’s…

What to expect at Neo4j’s GraphSummit: Join theCUBE Sept. 24

Enterprise AI adoption is growing rapidly, but a significant operational-readiness gap persists between experimentation and production deployment. To bridge this gap, graph databases that provide intelligent context are becoming essential. Neo4j Inc., a leader in graph technology, is developing AI-powered solutions to help developers create trusted, connected data that AI applications can retrieve, understand and act upon.

The GraphSummit event, hosted by theCUBE, will feature experts discussing Neo4j's role in the agentic AI era and the evolution of graph systems. Neo4j is addressing the operational-readiness gap by integrating Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) into its developer workflow, which combines vector search with relationship-aware retrieval.

This enables agents to understand business context and provide a traceable basis for their decisions. Neo4j's recent acquisition of GraphAware highlights its ambition as an intelligence layer for agentic AI. Although Neo4j is not a direct competitor to Palantir, it offers an alternative to Palantir Gotham, a data analysis and decision-making platform.

Written by urgent.news from SiliconANGLE's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at siliconangle.com →

More in Tech

We scheduled a question for an hour when nobody could answer it

The run was fully unattended. That was the point. Everything upstream of the final step had been automated for weeks, and the last remaining human touch was an approval — a request sent out, a wait, a…

  • Automated question pipeline experienced unexpected timeout glitch
  • Log entry provided no differentiation between rejection types
  • Gate assumed human presence without monitoring availability

I expected hexagonal architecture to help my coding agent. It didn't.

I am a principal engineer, and I started this experiment trying to defend something I have believed for years: invest in a good structure now, and later changes should get easier.

  • Hexagonal architecture implementation was 38% slower than flat version.
  • Flat version reached acceptance faster despite architectural investment.
  • Experiment questioned architectural habits and benefits of clean code.

More from Tuesday 15 September →