Sen. Mark Warner says U.S. can strengthen AI safety without losing race to China
The warnings about artificial intelligence are growing more urgent, and increasingly, they're coming from inside the industry. AI researchers have resigned over safety concerns, while some of the field's prominent leaders are calling for stronger government oversight. But Congress has yet to agree on meaningful safeguards. Geoff Bennett discussed more with Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia.
Artificial intelligence (AI) concerns are intensifying, with researchers and industry leaders pushing for government oversight. However, Congress has yet to pass any meaningful safeguards. Sen. Mark Warner, a top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, discussed the issue with Geoff Bennett. Warner acknowledged the warnings as increasingly urgent, though he didn't believe an "imminent existential threat" was on the horizon.
Instead, he emphasized the potential for "potentially catastrophic threat." He noted that the pushback against data centers, driven by concerns about energy, water usage, and community disruption, reflects a broader unease about the technology. Warner cited incidents involving OpenAI and Hugging Face, where large groups of AI agents collaborated in ways that demonstrated their potential to cause harm.
He also pointed to recent tools developed by these companies, involving thousands of agents working together, which raised further concerns. Warner criticized the Trump administration for its stance on AI regulation, arguing that a voluntary approach could inadvertently benefit China, which has already implemented stricter regulations on AI, including bans on certain types of deepfakes.
Warner advocated for a balanced approach that incorporates safety measures without hindering the competitiveness of American companies. He stressed that while America should aim to win the AI race, it should also ensure that its technology is safe and doesn't pose a threat to national security.
Written by urgent.news from PBS NewsHour Science's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
