Harry, Meghan 'won't be controlled by the palace'

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, known as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are set to continue their public roles as working royals, with their exact boundaries defined by guidance from the UK officials. This decision was announced on September 7, following their return to the UK. The guidance letter, issued on behalf of King Charles III, came just days after the royal couple's relocation back to the UK.

According to insiders close to the situation, Prince Harry believes he and Meghan could independently support causes they care about, without any control from the palace. One source claimed that the Duke made it clear to the palace that they would not be subject to its control. This sentiment was expressed shortly before Uganda's withdrawal from the Invictus Games, which Harry was scheduled to participate in in 2027.

Prince Harry's stance against palace restrictions was reportedly a point of contention. The Duke of Sussex was said to reject the idea of the palace limiting his and Meghan's ability to pursue the causes they are passionate about. The insider emphasized that Harry wanted to use their public profile to make a positive impact, but warned that this approach could clash with the late Queen Elizabeth II's decision.

King Charles III, while supportive of the royal couple's goals, was portrayed as having limitations. The King, while keen to make the arrangement work, was restrained by his "responsibility to the crown." The balance between the King's duties and Harry and Meghan's desires for autonomy created a complex dynamic, according to the report.

The Sussexes' decision to move their children to a new school in Britain after just two days at their previous school has also caused a stir. Prince Archie, aged 7, and Princess Lilibet, aged 5, are now at a different institution. The move was made following discussions between the royal family and their security team about the practicalities of transporting the children safely.

The Sussexes confirmed the decision, stating it was not a reflection on the original school's care but rather a practical arrangement for the family's security.