Vaibhav Sooryavanshi on the bench: Why India's bold T20I vision feels incomplete
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi's omission from the first T20I against Afghanistan has reignited India's biggest selection debate: experience versus explosive potential. While Sanju Samson failed to capitalise on his opportunity in England, the 15-year-old's remarkable Zimbabwe series and India's long-term attacking philosophy make a compelling case for persistence. The real question is whether India will…
NEW DELHI: India's T20I captain Shreyas Iyer faced a difficult decision while selecting his team for the upcoming series against Afghanistan. He had to choose between Sanju Samson, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and Abhishek Sharma, and often the decision came down to picking between Samson and Sooryavanshi. Samson brought experience, while Sooryavanshi brought a no-nonsense approach.
During the T20I series, both kept to themselves during team huddles and played their parts. Sooryavanshi went through the motions as the teams prepared for the match, taking aerial catches and lining up for some shadow batting. Abhishek Sharma proved his worth with a 32-ball 82, showcasing his batting skills on the surface. As the series progressed, questions arose about Sooryavanshi's role in the team and the long-term strategy for the format.
While Samson added a valuable wicketkeeping option and a left-right batting pairing, his presence also meant Sooryavanshi was left out, which some felt was a disservice to the young talent and Indian cricket in general.
Written by urgent.news from Times of India's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
