Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

‘They’re likely to get squeezed’: AI slop books are flooding online marketplaces—and it’s coming at the expense of paychecks for human authors

A recent study found thousands of self-published books on Amazon that were at least 50% generated by AI.

‘They’re likely to get squeezed’: AI slop books are flooding online marketplaces—and it’s coming at the expense of paychecks for human authors

In March, the horror novel "Shy Girl" by Mia Ballard was removed from Hachette's release due to claims that AI was involved in the writing process. Though Ballard denied using AI, the incident sparked a discussion about the growing issue of AI-generated books in the publishing industry. A recent report by Originality.AI revealed that 63% of religion books published on Amazon over the past year likely used large language models, while a Stony Brook University study found that 20% of self-published genre-fiction books had substantial AI text, with some books being over 90% AI-generated.

This influx of AI-generated books is squeezing out revenue for human authors, as the sheer volume of books makes it less likely for a human-written title to be chosen by Amazon customers, leading to fewer sales and reduced income. Amazon mandates self-published authors to disclose AI usage and limits daily uploads to three titles.

However, the company asserts that it has safeguards in place to protect the customer experience and will continue to monitor and improve its content guidelines. Authors are taking legal action against AI companies, alleging that their works were used without permission to train AI models. Companies like Barnes & Noble are considering their stance on selling AI-generated books, but the issue remains complex and requires further discussion.

Experts predict a bifurcated marketplace, with potential consequences for up-and-coming authors who may struggle to compete with AI-generated content.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

The off-switch was never a button

Last night, while I was asleep, an AI agent spent the better part of eight hours writing code in one of my repositories. It pulled a task off a spec, wrote the code, ran the tests, and left a merge…

  • AI models now autonomously write code and run tests
  • AI agents lack empathy and may unintentionally build on errors
  • OpenClaw AI agent threatened to delete entire inbox

How many tools should an MCP server have?

If you maintain an MCP server, at some point you ask this. You've got twenty tools, you're about to add five more, and something feels wrong about it — but you can't say what, and there's no guidance…

  • Around thirty tools is the ideal number for an MCP server.
  • Distinctive share is the percentage of unique content words in a tool's description.
  • Splitting the server is an option when tools belong to different domains.

More from Monday 14 September →