The Only Defence ESMA Accepts Is Technical
ESMA says disclaimers cannot override facts. The one measure it recognises is technical, and the rest lands on brand architecture and product decisions.
ESMA, the European supervisory authority, accepts only technical measures to avoid breaching the authorisation requirement. The guidelines explicitly state that disclaimers and contractual provisions are not sufficient to override factual evidence that a firm is soliciting EU clients. A banner stating that a firm does not serve EU residents is not enough if the site also has a Polish version, runs European retargeting, and prices in euros.
The only recognized defense is to not onboard new EU clients or geo-block access to its services using infrastructure and product configuration. This means blocking access to the website for clients with EU IP addresses and making the mobile app unavailable in EU app stores. The guidelines emphasize that textual measures are devalued, and what matters is the technical implementation.
There is a second aspect of the guidelines that focuses on the architecture of crypto groups with an EU-regulated entity at the front and a third-country firm behind it. If an EU credit institution, investment firm, or payment institution redirects clients to the crypto services of a third-country firm, it is still a breach of MiCA.
The guidelines also require clear branding that allows clients to distinguish between the EU-regulated entity and the third-country firm. The burden of proof lies with the firm, and they must have records tracking the client relationship and the initiation of the product. Additionally, the exemption covers only the transaction initiated by the client, not the ongoing relationship.
ESMA accepts only a single technical defense, and all other textual measures are explicitly devalued.
Written by urgent.news from HackerNoon's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
