Better Artificial Intelligence ETF: Roundhill's CHAT vs. State Street's XLK
Roundhill's AI-focused fund delivered 55.2% returns but carries higher volatility and fees. State Street's broader tech ETF offers lower costs and steadier performance for long-term investors.
The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) are two distinct investment vehicles with different focuses within the technology sector. CHAT provides targeted exposure to the generative AI theme, while XLK offers broad, low-cost access to established technology leaders in the S&P 500.
CHAT's strategy is more active and thematic, seeking to capture the evolving nature of artificial intelligence across various industries. In contrast, XLK follows a sector-rotation approach, holding well-established leaders within the technology sector. The beta of an ETF measures its price volatility relative to the S&P 500, calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history, which can span up to five years.
When comparing the 1-year returns, which represent the total return over the trailing 12 months, CHAT and XLK may exhibit different performance levels. Additionally, the dividend yield, calculated based on the trailing-12-month distribution yield, is another factor investors may consider. By understanding these key differences and metrics, investors can make informed decisions about which ETF aligns better with their investment goals and risk tolerance.
Written by urgent.news from Motley Fool's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
