Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

The Privacy Paradox: AI Personalization Without Surveillance in Web3

AI personalization usually follows a simple assumption: More data = better personalization. The system collects your behavior, preferences, identity, history, and interactions. Then the AI uses that context to make the experience feel more personal. But there is another question worth asking: Does AI really need all that data? What if we could give an AI system the information it needs without…

The article explores the concept of AI personalization in web3 without invasive surveillance. Traditional AI personalization collects extensive user data to generate personalized experiences, but the author argues that there might be a more privacy-preserving approach. One example is age verification: instead of collecting a user's date of birth, a zero-knowledge proof can be used to prove that the user is over 18 without revealing their actual birthdate.

Selective disclosure takes this idea further, allowing users to share only the necessary information for specific use cases. For instance, a verifiable credential containing various details about a user can be used to prove just a single piece of information, such as "developer = true" or "has React certification = true," rather than disclosing the entire credential.

The author then discusses how this concept can be applied to AI applications, such as a career assistant. By using selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs, the AI system can request only the necessary context and information, rather than receiving the entire user profile. This approach helps maintain user privacy while still providing the AI assistant with relevant context.

The article also highlights the importance of considering privacy throughout the entire system, not just at the AI and smart contract levels. Factors like browser privacy, wallet relationships, and on-chain data all contribute to the overall privacy of the system. The author concludes by suggesting that the goal should be for products to "know exactly what they need to help me," rather than the traditional mindset that "the more the product knows about me, the better it can help me."

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

More from Saturday 12 September →