Technology can help people sound fluent in a language, but proficiency still requires human interaction, expert says

Todd Hughes, a language tutor at Rosetta Stone, has a nuanced perspective on the difference between sounding fluent in a language and actually being proficient. While technology can aid in vocabulary practice and smooth communication, proficiency requires human interaction and the ability to navigate a conversation as it unfolds.

Hughes, who speaks Spanish at home and teaches German, French, and Nordic languages, finds that his language abilities shift depending on the context. He emphasizes that fluency is about flow and speaking smoothly, while proficiency is a broader measure of ability encompassing reading, writing, listening, and speaking.

Social media often conflates fluency and proficiency, as seen in polyglot videos on platforms like TikTok. These videos showcase impressive language skills but may not demonstrate how well someone can communicate in real-world situations. Hughes stresses that proficiency requires understanding the nuances of language, including cultural context and social cues, which AI translation tools cannot fully capture.

While AI can generate practice exercises and correct writing, Hughes remains skeptical about its ability to improve speaking skills. He believes that real-time translation can assist in understanding conversations but cannot replace the connection and cultural understanding that come from learning a language through human interaction.

Duolingo echoes this sentiment, stating that while translation can help in the moment, it cannot replace the personal satisfaction and social skills gained from learning a language with another person.