Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Streaming prices have surged nearly 70% in four years, and they're still going up

Apple TV+ has had one of the largest increases. The service launched in 2019 at $4.99 a month and has since raised its price by 200%. It still has a smaller overall library than most of its main competitors, but Apple has continued to add original series and films while... Read Entire Article

Streaming prices have surged nearly 70% in four years, and they're still going up

Streaming service subscriptions have increased in price by nearly 70% over the past four years, with the trend showing no signs of slowing down. Today, the eight major services cost around $151 per month in total for ad-free plans purchased separately, compared to roughly $90 in 2020. Apple TV+ has experienced the most significant price hike, with its initial launch price of $4.99 a month increasing by 200%.

Despite a smaller overall library, Apple continues expanding the service with original series and films. Disney+ also raised its prices significantly, starting at $6.99 a month without ads and expanding to include an ad-supported plan at $11.99 and a premium ad-free version. Paramount+ has seen an 80% increase over five years, while Netflix's Premium plan price has risen by 125% since its 2013 introduction.

The recent surge in streaming costs has been particularly notable, with a 11.8% increase over the past year and an average of 17.7% per year in 2023. Apple TV+ raised its price by 50% in the last year, and Peacock's plans increased by a similar margin. HBO Max has stood out as an exception, with a 23% price increase over six years. The industry's pricing has even outpaced inflation, with consumer prices rising by an average of 3.84% annually since 2019, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Streaming services have been more aggressive in raising prices compared to traditional cable and satellite TV, which have seen more gradual price increases of around 3.9% per year. However, the shift to higher-priced streaming services has been driven by companies investing heavily in original programming, subscriber growth, and technological advancements.

While cable packages can still cost over $170 a month, streaming companies are under pressure to become more profitable by implementing higher subscription fees, advertising, bundles, and stricter account sharing rules. Despite these challenges, consumers still have more flexibility with streaming services, allowing them to cancel and rejoin at will, which can help reduce costs but also alters viewing habits.

As a result, viewers may need to wait until a season ends or a show moves to another platform before subscribing, making the days of paying for one service and finding everything in one place largely a thing of the past.

Written by urgent.news from TechSpot's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at techspot.com →

More in Tech

Path-Based Routing with Reverse Proxy: Serving Multiple Websites from One Domain

Hey developers 👋 At some point in our development journey, we’ve all played around with domains, subdomains, routes, reverse proxies, and enough DNS records to make us question our life choices.

  • Serve two websites from one domain with reverse proxy
  • Path-based routing displays correct URLs without redirects
  • Blog hosted separately, appears as subpath of main site

What I learned checking 65 client domains with RDAP instead of WHOIS

I built a domain expiry monitor, and to test it against something other than my own domains I pointed it at the "our work" pages of 30 US web design agencies — the client sites they link to publicly…

  • RDAP provided structured JSON responses over HTTPS, unlike WHOIS's plain text
  • Registrar names hidden in jCard format, unlike WHOIS's straightforward display
  • IANA's bootstrap incomplete, leading to misdated public suffix expirations

I don't write the code. I drive the bus.

I used to write software. Now I work in mass agent transit. Ten AI agents on the bus today. The plan is a fleet of ten thousand. That sounds like a joke and it is about half of one.

  • The speaker transitions from software development to mass transit management.
  • Fleetcoding involves coordinating fleets of AI agents instead of writing individual code lines.
  • The reporter's role is to guide and manage the entire agent fleet, not just write code.

More from Saturday 12 September →