BRICS New Delhi Declaration: Key takeaways on tariffs, terrorism, West Asia war, and more

The BRICS grouping officially adopted the New Delhi Declaration on September 12, outlining their common stances on various subjects, including tariffs, terrorism, the conflict in West Asia, and more. The declaration emerged as a significant diplomatic achievement, particularly given the ongoing tensions surrounding tariffs, trade disputes, and the geopolitical dynamics of the region.

In opposition to unilateral trade restrictions, the declaration condemns "unilateral coercive measures" as being contrary to international law and the United Nations Charter. While it does not specifically name the United States, it acknowledges the impact of such measures on its members, aligning BRICS as a collective force against these protectionist policies.

The declaration also expresses its commitment to eliminating carbon border adjustment mechanisms if they are found to be unilateral, punitive, discriminatory, or protectionist.

Terrorism was addressed with strong language, with the declaration explicitly condemning all forms of terrorism and rejecting any double standards in combating it. A notable highlight was India's unanimous condemnation of the April 2025 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which resulted in 26 deaths. This marked a significant diplomatic success for India, especially as it involved China, whose stance on Pakistan-based terrorists has previously differed from India's.

Regarding the conflict in West Asia, BRICS expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions, calling for restraint and peaceful resolution through dialogue and diplomacy. The declaration reassured the importance of uninterrupted trade, supply chains, and energy flows, while also reiterating support for a two-state solution with a Palestinian state.

Israel's adherence to the Lebanon ceasefire and withdrawal from remaining Lebanese territory were also emphasized. Additionally, the group supported UNRWA and acknowledged the International Court of Justice's provisional measures in South Africa’s case against Israel.