Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Michigan Senate candidates battle over their records on 9/11 at 25-year mark

The candidates in Michigan's closely watched U.S. Senate race, Democrat Abdul El-Sayed and Republican Mike Rogers, have exchanged criticism over their records on the 9/11 attacks.

Lansing, Michigan — As the nation commemorated the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed addressed a group of college students, many of whom were too young to remember the tragic event. El-Sayed began the ceremony with a moment of silence to honor the victims before turning his focus to his opponent, Republican Mike Rogers, who has been increasingly critical of El-Sayed's associations in recent weeks.

El-Sayed directed her criticism at Rogers, who she claims voted against provisions that provided benefits and medical care to 9/11 survivors and first responders. She pointed specifically to Rogers' vote against the 2010 James Zadroga Act, which aimed to provide healthcare and financial aid to those affected by the attacks. El-Sayed's campaign has highlighted Rogers' opposition to the bill, stating that he chose to vote against giving first responders the healthcare they needed.

Rogers responded to the accusations by emphasizing his own advocacy for 9/11 victims, stating that he had supported annual funding and expressed concern that cutting off aid would jeopardize the financial stability of the United States. The dispute over their records has become a central theme in their campaign, with both candidates accusing each other of neglecting the needs of those who suffered during the attacks.

Meanwhile, El-Sayed's opponent, Mike Rogers, has been using 9/11 and the comments made by El-Sayed's running mate, Hasan Piker, as a political weapon. Piker, a Democratic streamer, made controversial remarks in 2019 about America "deserving" 9/11. El-Sayed distanced herself from Piker's remarks, calling them "dumb," but the issue has still become a point of contention in the race.

El-Sayed has also faced scrutiny over her own statements regarding the 9/11 attacks and the U.S. military interventions that followed. She has been quoted as saying that while 9/11 "scarred our country in profound ways," the country's response "scarred millions of other people." Republicans have seized on these comments, accusing El-Sayed of being too extreme and un-American.

The campaign has seen both candidates using the 9/11 anniversary to frame their positions on national security, healthcare, and the direction of the country. Rogers argues that El-Sayed and Piker are attacking America and excusing extremism, while El-Sayed maintains that she and her running mate are simply condemning the attacks and criticizing the political climate that allows such acts to occur. As the election draws near, the debate over 9/11 and its aftermath will likely continue to be a key issue in the Senate race.

Written by urgent.news from CBS News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at cbsnews.com →

More in World

More from Friday 11 September →