Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Tribal Affairs Secretary says community rights have potential to ‘strengthen gram sabha-led forest governance’

Union Tribal Affairs Secretary Ranjana Chopra’s remarks came at a regional conference in Bengaluru over the implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006, days after the Tribal Affairs Ministry’s own office memorandum, claiming that the FRA has “no provision for Gram Sabha consent” to divert forest land, led to severe criticism from Opposition leaders and Adivasi and forest dweller organisations…

Tribal Affairs Secretary says community rights have potential to ‘strengthen gram sabha-led forest governance’

The Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD) has urged the Tribal Affairs Ministry to retract its stance that there is "no provision" under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) for obtaining consent from Gram Sabhas when diverting forest land for non-forest purposes. The CSD, representing Adivasi and forest-dweller organizations, denounced the Ministry's position as "factually and legally untenable" and "a shocking mistake that could have been avoided by reading the law itself."

The controversy arises as the Ministry is currently negotiating with the Power Ministry over the necessity of 100% Gram Sabha consent, which has become a significant obstacle delaying government projects. This issue was highlighted by a Parliamentary Committee informed by the Power Ministry's National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC).

The CSD argued that this requirement is not the primary reason for project delays; in fact, between 2008-09 and 2022-23, 3,05,945.38 hectares of forest land were approved for non-forest use under the Forest (Conservation) Act of 1980 without adhering fully to FRA provisions.

Former Environment Minister and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh had previously labeled the Tribal Affairs Ministry's stance as "shocking" and inconsistent with the law, Supreme Court judgments, and established procedures. The CSD echoed this criticism, alleging that the Ministry's position was motivated by appeasing project developers, contractors, and corporations.

They emphasized that the Gram Sabha consent requirement has been the established legal norm for nearly two decades and that attempting to reverse it through this method is "cowardly, anti-people, anti-democratic, and unconstitutional."

The CSD further criticized the Ministry for erasing the requirement of Gram Sabha consent from the law entirely, despite the Parliamentary Committee and the NHPC only suggesting reducing the 100% threshold. They pointed out that the Forest Rights Act is being widely violated, with the current NDA government rapidly diverting land for large-scale projects, endangering forests and the rights of forest-dwelling communities.

Written by urgent.news from The Hindu's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at thehindu.com →

More in Science

Natalie L. Massey

Ms. Natalie L. Massey serves as Deputy Director of the Office of the Executive Secretariat (OES) in the Office of the Administrator at NASA, where she co-leads enterprise governance operations…

More from Thursday 10 September →