Settlement trade ban: Burnham succeeds in weeks where Starmer failed for years
Settlement trade ban: Burnham succeeds in weeks where Starmer failed for years Submitted by Peter Oborne on Wed, 09/09/2026 - 16:05 While more action is still needed, these sanctions go a long way towards bringing Britain in line with ICJ ruling on Israeli occupation British Prime Minister Andy Burnham speaks in the House of Commons on 9 September 2026 (House of Commons/AFP) On Less than two…
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has successfully implemented a ban on trade with Israeli settlements within weeks, a feat Keir Starmer, his predecessor, failed to achieve in years. This move brings Britain in line with the 2024 International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling, which deemed Israel's presence in the occupied Palestinian territories illegal.
While more action is still required, these sanctions significantly advance Britain's alignment with the ICJ judgment. The decision has created a clear divide between Burnham's Labour Party and the Conservative opposition, led by Kemi Badenoch. However, the Conservative party's reaction to the ban has been met with criticism, as they have echoed Israeli talking points and supported Israel despite its numerous human rights violations and allegations of genocide.
The Burnham government's ban has not yet been tested in opinion polls, but past polling suggests the majority of British people, including Muslims, support the measure. The ban has also garnered international support, with countries like Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden backing the decision.
Some Israeli experts, like former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have also welcomed the ban, as it is seen as a response to the unethical actions of extremist Jewish groups in the West Bank. Despite the hostility from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, many Israelis view the ban as a necessary measure against ongoing ethnic cleansing.
Written by urgent.news from Middle East Eye's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
