CEO politics may shape how companies compete
Decisions such as whether to cut prices, launch a product, open a new facility or make an acquisition are among those companies that consider in pursuit of a competitive edge. New research from Texas A&M University suggests a CEO's political affiliation may be associated with whether the company's overall strategy follows industry peers or charts a different course.
A new study from Texas A&M University suggests that a CEO's political affiliation may influence how their company competes within its industry. Researchers Krishnan Nair and Eric Y. Lee found that Republican CEOs tend to mimic the strategies of their industry peers, while Democratic-led firms deviate more from the norm. However, the researchers note that the relationship between political affiliation and competitive strategy is not fixed and is also influenced by the political makeup of the CEO pool within an industry.
Both ideology and political identity may help explain how CEOs approach competitive strategy, with identity-based perspectives suggesting that political preferences can change depending on the prevailing beliefs within a CEO's political tribe. The study also found that the relationship between conformity and company performance differed based on the CEO's political affiliation, with Republican-led companies performing better when their strategies were more conforming, while Democratic-led companies performed better when their strategies were less conforming.
Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
