Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Culture

Trump gives Natalie Harp, 2 aides $45,000 each: Why cash gifts are under scrutiny

Trump gives Natalie Harp, 2 aides $45,000 each: Why cash gifts are under scrutiny

A recent revelation has sparked speculation about potential ethical breaches involving President Donald Trump's financial dealings with one of his closest aides, Natalie Harp. According to financial disclosures, Trump bestowed a $45,000 cash gift to Harp, alongside two other White House staff members, Margo Martin and Chamberlain Harris, during the holiday season.

This unusual practice appears to contravene federal laws that prohibit outside sources from providing supplementary income to federal employees. In response to the disclosure, the White House issued a statement asserting that the gifts in question are unrelated to the recipients' official duties and thus are permissible under the relevant legal and ethical standards.

Trump has a history of giving cash presents to individuals close to him, including employees and aides in both his government and private capacities. While such gifts may appear to be acts of genuine generosity, they often serve as displays of the donor's perceived power and influence. The close relationship between Trump and Harp, however, has raised suspicions that the $45,000 gift may be more than just a customary holiday gesture.

Harp's unwavering loyalty to the president, including her claims of him saving her life during her cancer diagnosis and her willingness to live in his Bedminster golf course to be closer to him, have fueled concerns about the nature of their relationship. Critics argue that such close proximity, coupled with the substantial monetary gift, suggests something more sinister - a cult-like devotion that may violate ethical and legal norms.

Written by urgent.news from Mother Jones's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at timesofindia.indiatimes.com →

More in Culture

More from Wednesday 9 September →