The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s oil deal: Venezuela pays for his vanity | Editorial
The US president seized a nation’s natural wealth in a modern-day version of gunboat diplomacy to feed his ego – not to lower Americans’ fuel bills Imperialism does not require a flag to be planted or a governor dispatched. It can be a powerful nation deciding who governs a smaller, weaker country, and on what terms and for whose benefit its resources will be developed. Donald Trump’s kidnapping…
President Donald Trump's recent maneuvering in Venezuela can be likened to a modern iteration of gunboat diplomacy, according to a recent editorial in The Guardian. The US president orchestrated the removal of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, replacing him with his deputy Delcy Rodríguez. In the wake of this regime change, Rodríguez then signed a deal that effectively cedes a fifth of Venezuela's proven oil reserves to the United States.
This action, the author argues, is a clear example of imperialism, where a powerful nation asserts control over a weaker country and dictates terms for resource development.
The US president's grandiose claims of securing "the biggest oil deal in history" are called into question. While Venezuela's new production might eventually lower oil prices, it is unlikely to have an immediate impact. Moreover, the timing of this deal coincides with the upcoming midterms, raising concerns about whether it will benefit Republican candidates by reducing energy costs for American voters. Given that many Americans are grappling with soaring energy bills, the benefits to Republican candidates seem doubtful.
Written by urgent.news from Guardian Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
