Kid Cudi Says M.I.A. Lawsuit Is D.O.A. Because of the First Amendment: ‘Fails on Its Face’
The rapper says he has a free speech right to pick and choose who is on his concert tour, meaning he could legally fire M.I.A. after her onstage political rants.
Kid Cudi's legal team has filed a motion claiming that M.I.A.'s lawsuit against him is doomed from the start, citing the First Amendment as their reasoning. The dispute stems from Cudi removing M.I.A. from his Rebel Rangers Tour after she made politically charged remarks during a Dallas performance. M.I.A., whose real name is Mathangi Arulpragasam, had claimed that Cudi's decision was illegal and that his actions threatened her First Amendment rights.
However, Kid Cudi's attorneys argue that the case should be dismissed under California's anti-SLAPP law, which protects individuals from lawsuits that threaten their free speech rights. They contend that the tour's casting decisions and content are protected forms of artistic expression, and that M.I.A.'s lawsuit violates her constitutional rights.
Written by urgent.news from Billboard's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
