Israel rejects push to keep international troops in south Lebanon after Unifil exit
Israel’s UN envoy said on Tuesday his country opposes efforts to maintain a large international military presence in southern Lebanon after the UN peacekeeping mission’s mandate ends, arguing Lebanese forces should assume responsibility for securing the border. “Our position is very clear. We think that the decision that was passed in the Security Council on Unifil finishing its mandate by the…
Israel’s UN envoy, Danny Danon, has firmly rejected proposals to maintain a significant international military presence in southern Lebanon once the UN peacekeeping mission, Unifil, wraps up its duties by the end of the year. According to Danon, the decision to conclude Unifil’s mandate should be respected, as Lebanese forces must assume responsibility for securing the border.
The envoy expressed surprise at the suggestion of retaining thousands of troops in Lebanon, as initially proposed by the UN peacekeeping chief, Jean-Pierre Lacroix. Israel, alongside the US, has argued that it is in Lebanon’s best interest to transition to the next stage and disperse international forces. Danon emphasized that Israel has direct arrangements with neighboring countries' militaries, including Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, to address border security.
He also noted that while France and Italy have supported a joint initiative to create an international coalition to assist Lebanon, Israel opposes the move, as it is currently engaged in conflict with Hezbollah. The envoy stated that any foreign troops stationed near the Israeli border would be particularly sensitive to Israel, and Israel would prefer a focus on training the Lebanese military elsewhere.
Written by urgent.news from The National UAE's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.