AI broke code review. Two experts disagree on what replaces it.
Ask two experienced engineers about how to handle the flood of AI-generated code in their review queues, and you’ll get The post AI broke code review. Two experts disagree on what replaces it. appeared first on The New Stack .
John Bristowe, Principal Developer Advocate at Octopus Deploy, and Viktor Farcic, platform engineering voice behind DevOps Toolkit, will engage in a live discussion on September 29 to address the challenge of handling AI-generated code in code review queues. The conversation, titled "Human Review vs. Verified Pipelines: What Catches Bugs in the Age of AI Code," aims to identify the most effective methods for reviewing and verifying code produced by artificial intelligence.
Attendees will have the opportunity to share their current strategies for verifying AI-written code, with options including manual code review, some automated checks alongside manual review, evaluating pipeline-based verification tools, actively implementing a verification pipeline, or already having a pipeline in place but seeking to refine it.
The debate surrounding the replacement of traditional code review practices with AI-generated code remains unsettled, and this webinar seeks to shed light on the most reliable approaches in the era of AI.
Written by urgent.news from The New Stack's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
