Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Attestkeep 1.0 is out, and the comment thread is in the changelog

Six days ago I posted SOC 2, CRA, NIS2: they all ask your cluster the same five questions . I expected a few reactions. What I got was three people reading the mechanism instead of the claims, and two of them found a hole that mattered. Today the tool behind that post reached 1.0. Most of what changed between the post and the release came out of that thread, and it would be strange to write a…

Attestkeep 1.0 has been released, with its comment thread now included in the changelog. The tool is a validating admission webhook for Kubernetes, which reviews pod CREATE and UPDATE events against a policy. This includes checks such as the :latest tag, registry allow-list, digest pinning, vulnerability thresholds, cosign signatures, attestations, and fifteen workload hardening checks. The policy's decision is recorded in a ledger, which can be signed into a package of evidence.

Recent comments by Vinh Nguyen and Tobias prompted updates to Attestkeep 1.0. Vinh pointed out the need for a second component to the ledger, which handles admission decisions for running containers that have no admission event. He also highlighted a destructive case where a manually applied pod has no controller, leading to the pod being closed and the finding being deleted.

Tobias questioned whether the absence of findings should be recorded as evidence, to which the answer is that the operator verifies its own webhook endpoint against the CA bundle and records any windows of failure as part of the evidence package.

Two significant features in Attestkeep 1.0 are admissionTiming and failurePolicy. admissionTiming determines how the scanner fills a cache in the background before the API server waits to process the admission event. failurePolicy allows the operator to choose whether to allow pods to run while the webhook is unreachable or to immediately deny admission. These decisions are now clearly recorded in the evidence package, emphasizing that the choice is up to the operator and their consequences are documented.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

New iPhone 18 May Signal Higher Prices Ahead

iPhone 18 prices may rise by $100 or more as AI-driven chip costs hit consumers, signaling wider tech price increases.

  • iPhone 18 may launch in September 2026
  • AI infrastructure demand driving component costs up
  • iPhone 18 Pro models could be $200-$300 pricier

More from Sunday 6 September →