Trading 'woke palaces' for 'basic' homes reduces cost but comes with drawbacks
The shadow housing minister is spruiking a simpler building code to speed up housing construction, but could cutting back on energy efficiency and accessibility cost more in the long run?
Liberal senator Andrew Bragg suggests a simpler Australian building standard could expedite home construction, comparing it to buying a basic car versus a luxury vehicle. However, critics argue cutting energy efficiency and accessibility features could introduce new costs, such as higher electricity bills and renovation expenses.
Young Australians have diverse opinions on the policy; while some welcome cheaper homes, others warn of potential long-term drawbacks. The Coalition advocates for reducing bureaucratic hurdles to build more affordable homes, rather than "woke palaces." Shadow housing minister Andrew Bragg proposes significantly relaxing the National Construction Code, potentially cutting the 2,200-page document to 80-90 pages.
Despite agreeing that homes would still be strong, safe, and secure, Bragg initially suggested such homes would be "substandard." The government is currently working to streamline the code, noting its complexity and high costs. While supporters emphasize the need for more affordable housing and simpler regulations, some suggest targeting other areas instead of accessibility and environmental issues.
Written by urgent.news from ABC News AU's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
