Pete Baklinski: CBC platforms prof who says Clancy killings make case for looser infanticide law
Canada’s state broadcaster recently published an article on Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, ages 5, 3, and 8 months. In its Sept. 1 article, CBC News does not ask how a just and humane society should treat the killing of children. It gives the dead almost none of the […]
Lindsay Clancy's six-week criminal trial, which charged her with three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of her three children, ended without a verdict as the judge declared a mistrial. The Massachusetts mother was accused of killing her children due to a postpartum psychosis she claimed she suffered from after the birth of her youngest son.
Her defense argued she should not be held criminally responsible, while prosecutors contended she was a functioning mother who had meticulously planned the murders. If found guilty, Clancy faced life in prison with no possibility of parole; a not guilty verdict would have resulted in her being committed to a state mental health facility.
The trial spanned six weeks and involved over four weeks of witness testimony, reigniting discussions about how postpartum mental health is addressed in the US. However, the 12-person jury, composed of nine women and three men, was unable to reach a unanimous verdict after deliberating for nearly 40 hours. Jurors revealed that one of them refused to follow the law on reasonable doubt, creating an impasse in the proceedings.
Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial, stating he had no choice but to do so. While the case is not closed, prosecutors are free to initiate a new trial with a new jury. Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz stated that no decision had been made on whether prosecutors would retry the case, emphasizing the importance of getting justice for the three children.
New York Law School professor Heather Ellis Cucolo suggested prosecutors would need to consider various factors, including the case's expense and likely outcome. The defense lawyer for Clancy, Kevin Reddington, argued that it would be difficult to find another set of jurors unaware of the case's extensive media coverage. Boston-based defense lawyer Randy Gioia suggested that prosecutors should not put Clancy through another trial, given the level of trauma involved and the fact that their case seemed weak.
Sullivan set a hearing for September 29, where Reddington may request Clancy's acquittal, although such a request is unlikely to succeed. Prosecutors could also choose to pursue a plea deal or drop the case entirely. Clancy has been confined to a state psychiatric hospital before and during the trial, and she would remain in custody if a second trial were to proceed.
Written by urgent.news from ABC News AU's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
