Move over data centers, the midterms have a new campaign target
Wisconsin’s candidates for governor want to limit them, while Pennsylvania’s say they support a ban. A Michigan congressional candidate called them “un-American.” A Florida Senate candidate is selling merch opposing them . Across the country and up and down ballots, candidates from both parties are increasingly on the attack over Flock cameras , the AI -powered nationwide network of automated…
Candidates from both major political parties are increasingly targeting the use of Flock cameras in their campaigns as the midterms approach. These AI-powered cameras, manufactured by Atlanta-based Flock Safety, operate in 6,000 communities across the United States, capturing license plate and other vehicle data that can be accessed by law enforcement for crime-fighting purposes.
While police agencies tout the cameras as an invaluable tool in fighting crime, critics argue that their widespread deployment constitutes unconstitutional warrantless mass surveillance.
The issue has become a new campaign battleground for candidates, with some championing bans or restrictions on the technology, while others emphasize the importance of maintaining a balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Flock Safety maintains that its cameras have solved around one million crimes and reunited approximately 10,000 missing individuals with their families, urging those who voice opposition to engage with the facts and the technology's actual impact.
Political opponents have cited privacy concerns in their criticism. A Flock spokeswoman stated that the company asks those who weigh in on the issue to consider the factual record, including the crimes solved, families reunited, and safeguards already in place. Flock opponents, on the other hand, argue that the cameras represent a threat to privacy and demand stricter regulations, including transparency, accountability, and limits on data retention and sharing.
The debate over Flock cameras has manifested itself in various races across the country, including in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, and Rhode Island. Some candidates, like Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico in Texas and Pennsylvania Governor candidate Josh Shapiro, have outright opposed the cameras, while others, like Democratic Wisconsin Governor candidate David Crowley, have proposed implementing stricter regulations and transparency measures if elected.
Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
