Aging doesn't look the same for everyone at the molecular level — it's 'individualized and context-dependent'
People's bodies may reflect their ages very differently at the molecular level, even when they are the same chronological age, according to a new study.
New research reveals that aging isn't uniform across individuals at the molecular level; instead, it varies significantly depending on the person and their circumstances. This finding, published in the journal Science, challenges the notion of a single metric for measuring biological age.
The study, conducted on 335 women aged 32 to 80 over an eight-year period, analyzed data from the TwinsUK cohort, which comprises over 15,000 identical and fraternal twins from the United Kingdom. Researchers measured changes in gene activity and metabolite levels in blood samples collected at multiple visits throughout the study.
The findings showed that while most genes and metabolites followed consistent trends, many individuals exhibited opposite patterns. For instance, a metabolite that increased in one woman could decrease in another, and some metabolites remained relatively stable over time. This suggests that biological aging is characterized by diverse molecular trajectories rather than a fixed score.
Several factors influenced these molecular changes, including genetics, immune cell types, daily biological rhythms, and seasonal variations. Even identical twins showed differences in gene expression patterns, indicating that genetics plays a significant role. Additionally, some metabolites were associated with changes in environmental chemicals like PFAS, although the study did not establish a direct causal relationship.
The researchers concluded that aging is more individualized and context-dependent than previously thought. Understanding these individual trajectories could help distinguish healthy aging from molecular changes associated with disease, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger and more diverse populations.
Written by urgent.news from Live Science's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.