Trump’s Neocolonialism Will Backfire
The President is touting his big Venezuelan oil deal, but his interventions abroad are stirring anger and having unintended consequences.
The recent deal struck by the Trump administration concerning Venezuela's oil industry has drawn significant criticism and raised concerns about the potential consequences. Since January, when the U.S. captured Nicolás Maduro, Donald Trump has been focused on the country's vast oil reserves as a primary interest. Despite reports suggesting otherwise, Trump's aides have focused on portraying Maduro's regime as a narco-trafficking threat.
Following Maduro's arrest in New York City, his former Vice-President, Diosdado Cabello, turned into a willing client of the Trump administration. Cabello's company, North American Blue Energy Partners, based in Barbados, is poised to be one of the first private firms to participate directly in Venezuela's oil industry, which has been nationalized for half a century. The company will administer the concessions granted to the U.S. in collaboration with the Pentagon's Office of Strategic Capital.
Trump touted the deal as a win for American people, asserting that it would consolidate U.S. control over the hemisphere's greatest store of untapped petroleum and potentially lower gas prices. However, oil prices surged in the days following the announcement, partly due to ongoing hostilities over the Strait of Hormuz resulting from Trump's decision to wage war on Iran.
While the deal may take years to fully replenish the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, it could potentially bring in $100 billion in new investment to boost Venezuelan output and develop uncultivated oil fields. Critics argue that the deal is a clear manifestation of Trump's world view, which is materialist, transactional, and disregards concerns about the rule of law and what's best for the Venezuelan people.
As highlighted by Venezuelan economist Ricardo Hausmann, the agreement appears to have been negotiated outside of Venezuela's constitutional constraints. Former energy minister Rafael Ramírez called the arrangement a "sellout" that opened the doors to "new colonialism of the United States." Other critics, including opposition leader José Amalio Graterol, denounced the deal as signed by those who usurp power, warning of its potential nullification in the future.
The deal is seen as an extension of Trump's investment in Diosdado Cabello, who has transformed Venezuela from the U.S.'s regional foe into a potential "fifty-first state." However, the lack of transparency surrounding the deal raises concerns about potential corruption and exacerbates economic hardships in Venezuela.
Written by urgent.news from The New Yorker's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
