Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Repeal of U.S. Roadless Rule could threaten drinking water for 25 million people

The drinking water for about 25 million Americans starts in the backcountry of the national forests, on land where roads are few by design. A rule the Trump administration proposed last week could open that land to roads and logging. On Aug. 18, the U.S. Department of Agriculture filed a proposed rule to fully rescind […]

Repeal of U.S. Roadless Rule could threaten drinking water for 25 million people

A proposed U.S. government rule to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule could pose a threat to drinking water for roughly 25 million Americans, according to a recent report. The Trump administration announced its intention to fully rescind this rule, which has been in place since 2001, on August 18. The rule prohibits new road construction and commercial logging on approximately 45 million acres (18 million hectares) of national forest land, areas predominantly used by wildland firefighters and environmental organizations for conservation purposes.

The controversy surrounding the proposed rule has drawn significant criticism from various stakeholders, including wildland firefighters, environmental groups, lawmakers, and scientists. While much of the debate has focused on logging practices and fire management, researchers have pointed out that the rule's impact extends beyond these issues and can affect the safety of drinking water for millions of people.

Forests play a crucial role in acting as natural water filters. They intercept rainfall, slow down runoff, and trap sediment before water reaches streams, rivers, and reservoirs. However, roads and logging operations can disrupt this process, as they introduce sediment into waterways. A 2024 study published in Forests found that forest roads contribute up to 90 percent of sediment loads in streams, significantly disrupting the stability of watersheds.

This sediment runoff forces utility companies to spend additional resources on water treatment, ultimately increasing costs for consumers.

An earlier study published in July in PLOS Water estimated that around 25 million Americans rely on water sources that could be impacted by the proposed rule. With forests serving as natural filters, the potential removal of this conservation rule could have serious consequences for the water quality and safety of communities across the United States.

Written by urgent.news from Mongabay's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at news.mongabay.com →

More in Science

More from Thursday 3 September →