Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Trump is proposing a US Space Academy – if created, it could blur the lines between NASA and the military

No, the US Space Academy wouldn’t be a real-life Starfleet Academy. But what it would be is still a little unclear.

On August 28, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at establishing a United States Space Academy. This proposal, which would mirror the structure of military academies, is a fresh initiative in the realm of space policy. As a space policy analyst, I have identified several uncertainties and potential challenges associated with this concept.

Trump's efforts to bolster space exploration were evident during his tenure, encompassing the initiation of the Artemis program in 2017 and the endorsement of a dedicated space branch of the military in 2018, which culminated in the creation of the Space Force. Consequently, it is not surprising that Trump has maintained his interest in space matters throughout his second term.

During a speech in Texas, Trump indicated that the U.S. Space Academy would cater to the needs of the United States Space Force, NASA, and the civilian spaceflight sector, asserting that it would be on par with existing service academies such as West Point, the U.S. Air Force Academy, and the U.S. Naval Academy. However, the actual executive order doesn't formalize the establishment of the space academy.

Instead, it mandates a commission to investigate the feasibility of such an institution and submit a report within 120 days. The commission, led by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, is tasked with gathering input from various stakeholders including the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Adviser, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

The academy would aim to "develop a professional corps of civically grounded leaders prepared to advance American interests within the space domain." As a NASA-led federal academy, it would be the first nonmilitary service academy run by the government. The commission would subsequently determine the curriculum to be offered.

Several questions remain unanswered. First, both Trump's remarks and the executive order have sparked debate about the relationship between a space academy and the military. Trump's analogy to military academies and his reliance on the Space Force to justify the space academy run contrary to the executive order's assertion that the endeavor is NASA-led.

This discrepancy has even permeated news coverage, with headlines such as "A West Point for Space?" The U.S. space policy has been distinct between civilian endeavors like NASA and military activities since the 1950s. The U.S. Space Academy proposal rekindles this debate over the separation of civilian and military roles. Another question pertains to the academy's curriculum.

Unlike military academies, which blend military training with typical college degree programs like engineering or social sciences, the nature of a space academy's curriculum remains unclear, particularly the balance between military applications of space and exploration or scientific pursuits. The executive order also raises concerns about potential obligations for academy graduates to serve in the Space Force and the level of military-specific training they would receive.

A second issue stems from the role of Congress. Beyond creating new bureaucratic entities, Congress must also allocate funding. While the exact annual cost of maintaining military service academies is not easily ascertainable, a congressional estimate pegs it at around US$1 billion per year. Creating an entirely new academy would likely necessitate significantly more funding.

If the academy is led by NASA, as suggested by the executive order, securing funding could prove even more challenging, given that NASA is often one of the first agencies to face budget cuts. Additional questions include the selection process for students, whether they will apply, where the academy will be situated, and the degrees it will offer.

Establishing the U.S. Space Academy could prove beneficial, considering the growing significance of space in daily life. The proliferation of civilian, commercial, and military space activities in recent years, including satellite constellations like SpaceX's Starlink and the GPS, underscores the escalating importance of space. A dedicated space academy could cultivate the next generation of engineers, scientists, and spacecraft operators.

Written by urgent.news from The Conversation's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at theconversation.com →

More in Science

More from Wednesday 2 September →