Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Populist One Nation’s latest victory points to a thirst for unity. But there are better ways to feel connected | Peter Lewis

When we last polled attitudes to membership, I argued the first act of resistance is to join something. Ten years on, that project is even more urgent Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast One Nation’s byelection win at Secret Harbour on the weekend can be dismissed as the result of the politics of anger and exclusion, but if we are serious about understanding the surge in…

Populist One Nation’s latest victory points to a thirst for unity. But there are better ways to feel connected | Peter Lewis

When the last poll on membership attitudes was conducted, the author argued that joining something is often the first step in resistance. A decade later, this initiative has become even more critical. The latest victory of One Nation in a byelection at Secret Harbour can be attributed to the politics of anger and exclusion, but understanding the surge in support for Pauline Hanson’s party requires recognizing a yearning for belonging and shared identity.

In a society where people feel more disconnected from their leaders and one another, the party's name appears to provide a patriotic opposition to the current order. Similar to other populist movements worldwide, One Nation is gaining traction during a period of social disconnection and isolation. A recent Guardian Essential report highlights this phenomenon: a significant portion of the population, one-third to be precise, has never been a part of any group.

Written by urgent.news from The Guardian Australia's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at theguardian.com →

More in World

Democratic Party of Korea Rep. Park Ji-won on the 31st made a remark that seemed to criticize former Justice Minister Cho Kuk, saying “(Cho Kuk) was sleeping and suddenly (became a politician and) made a big mess.” On this day, Rep. Park made a Facebook post saying “If the prosecution pushes through with the indictment against my wife, I will have no choice but to take responsibility as a husband,” referring to the prosecutors’ investigation into allegations that Rep. Park’s wife, Kim Kyeong-suk, illegally intervened in a prosecution probe. In the post, Rep. Park also mentioned, “If they (the prosecution) go through with the cancellation of the indictment, it will be a fiasco for them,” which seemed to imply that if the prosecution cancels the indictment, it will only end in embarrassment for them. However, Rep. Park’s remark about Cho Kuk drew more attention. When asked by a reporter about his remark, Rep. Park said, “I was just making a remark that can be commonly said in everyday life. I didn’t mean anything in particular.” However, Rep. Park’s remark was made on the same day that Rep. Lee Hae-chan, the leader of the Democratic Party of Korea, made a remark that seemed to criticize Cho Kuk, saying, “If there are any remaining issues with Cho Kuk, they should be resolved within the party.” Earlier on the 30th, Rep. Kim Chong-in, the interim leader of the Democratic Party of Korea, also made a remark that seemed to take distance from Cho Kuk, saying, “The party and Cho Kuk are separate.” It appears that Rep. Park’s remark was made in a similar context, and it seems that some within the Democratic Party of Korea are trying to distance themselves from Cho Kuk. Rep. Park’s remark sparked controversy, and some on social media criticized Rep. Park, saying, “It seems that some lawmakers are trying to distance themselves from Cho Kuk.” On the other hand, some supporters of Cho Kuk expressed discomfort with Rep. Park’s remark, saying, “It seems that Rep. Park is trying to take a swipe at Cho Kuk.” Cho Kuk himself has not made a public remark about Rep. Park’s comment.

More from Tuesday 1 September →