What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.
OpenAI filed a court brief calling the dispute "a mess of Apple's own making," citing the company's data policies and offboarding procedures
We haven't written up this one. Quartz has the full story — the link below goes straight to it.
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
I was up at 2 AM, staring at seventeen PDFs that refused to tell me anything. My midterm was in six days, and my notes were a mess of arrows, acronyms, and half-typed definitions.
Last Tuesday, my free endpoint returned a valid JSON contract. The next call returned a summary. Same prompt. Same model label. No version bump.
We talked to an attorney about OpenAI's claims that Apple didn't protect trade secrets sufficiently, so they were fair game. That probably won't work out that well for OpenAI.
Before publishing: set published: true , and check canonical_url — the article must exist at that URL on the site first. Without it this competes with the original in search instead of pointing at it.
OpenAI has pushed back against Apple's claims of trade secret theft in a recent federal court document. OpenAI asserts that internal strife at Apple is to blame for the current legal confrontation…
A maintainer once watched an AI assistant confidently recommend merging a pull request that deleted a test file. The prompt had included the entire issue thread, the last three commits, and a README…
