Judge tells Lindsay Clancy jury to keep deliberating after failing to reach a unanimous decision so far

On Wednesday, the jury in Lindsay Clancy's trial returned to court to attempt another verdict in the deaths of her three children. Initially unable to agree after several days of deliberation, the jury was instructed to keep trying. Clancy, who pleaded not guilty, faces three counts of first-degree murder; prosecutors allege she intentionally killed the children in their Massachusetts home in 2023.

Her defense claims she suffered from postpartum psychosis, rendering her unable to distinguish right from wrong and thus not criminally responsible. Jurors first began deliberations on Thursday following testimony from numerous witnesses. The panel returned to the courtroom on Tuesday, expressing a deadlock to Judge William Sullivan, causing audible gasps in the room.

Clancy, a 36-year-old former nurse, appeared unemotional in a wheelchair beside her lawyer, who was left paralyzed after jumping from a second-story window following the killings. Experts suggest jurors often struggle in high-profile, emotionally charged trials, with Heather Cucolo, a New York Law School professor, stating that jurors have not been given a specific deadline, though there are limits to the number of times a judge can request additional deliberation.

If deadlock persists a third time, the judge may issue a "dynamite" instruction to encourage the jury to consider alternative viewpoints while upholding their beliefs. Failure to reach an agreement could result in a mistrial. Clancy's trial, which has garnered significant public attention, has ended in a deadlock, leaving her fate uncertain.