Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

'I regret the tone': Top tech investor clarifies data centre remarks

Tech investor Gavin Baker has changed his stance on data centers, now recognizing the valid concerns that were present around eighteen months ago. However, with well-structured projects resolving many of these issues, data centers are now contributing positively to local economies, especially benefiting blue-collar workers in small towns. He suggests that criticism towards data centers may no…

'I regret the tone': Top tech investor clarifies data centre remarks

Tech investor Gavin Baker has apologized for the tone of his previous remarks criticizing data centers. In a recent post, Baker expressed regret for dismissing opposition to data centers as unqualified, stating that he now acknowledges reasonable concerns about issues such as water usage, taxes, job creation, electricity prices, environmental impact, and effects on small towns.

Baker clarified that well-structured data center projects have since addressed these concerns and that the industry's overall record now deserves praise. He outlined how newer data centers use less water than golf courses, pay significant property taxes, create jobs for various skilled trades, and utilize cleaner energy sources like natural gas and renewable energy.

Baker emphasized that data centers are revitalizing small towns across America, boosting the economy and providing durable working-class jobs. He concluded by stating that future projects should prioritize aesthetics, suggesting that data centers be designed as beautifully as iconic landmarks like Grand Central Station.

Written by urgent.news from Times of India's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at timesofindia.indiatimes.com →

More in Tech

Privileged access management skipped everyone between 50 and 500 engineers

Disclosure: I work on Tessera, which is one of the tools in the gap I am describing. Ask a fifty-person engineering organisation how they control production access and you will hear the same answer…

  • Privileged access management tools become unaffordable for mid-sized organizations
  • Self-hosting and per-seat pricing make PAM viable for 50-500 engineer firms
  • Tessera, Teleport, and Boundary offer free tiers with required features

Auditors do not want your policy. They want an artefact.

Disclosure: I work on an access tool (Tessera), mentioned once at the end. Everything before that is about evidence, and applies whatever you use.

  • Audits fail due to lack of evidence, not missing controls
  • Organizations need specific artifacts to satisfy auditors
  • Artifact properties: separate storage, immutability, exportability

Your access tool is a vendor with a copy of your infrastructure map

Disclosure: I work on Tessera, which is self-hosted. That is the position I am arguing from, and the costs of that position are in the last section.

  • Access tool is a vendor with infrastructure map copy
  • Security questionnaires overlook access-control role
  • Hosted access broker knows infrastructure details

Electrically Charged Raindrops Can Corrode Cars and Buildings

Researchers have found that tiny electrical charges picked up by moving water droplets may be damaging cars and buildings like the Eiffel Tower.

  • Tiny electrical charges on raindrops degrade Teflon and corrode copper.
  • Contact electrification causes water droplets to become charged spontaneously.
  • Study suggests electrical state of water droplets influences corrosion.

More from Tuesday 1 September →