Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Cuba’s tourism plummets 62% after US pressure and energy embargo

HAVANA (AP) — Cuba's tourism has plummeted by 62% since the United States intensified its pressure on the island this year, according to official statistics. The decline was outlined in a report from the National Office of Statistics and Information (ONEI), which noted a drastic drop in the number of visitors arriving in Cuba between January and July of this year compared to the same period in 2025.

This significant decrease was attributed to the U.S.-imposed energy embargo and heightened pressure on international tour operators in the island nation. The ONEI report revealed that only 419,000 tourists had arrived in Cuba during the specified period, a stark contrast to the 1.1 million visitors who came during the same timeframe in 2025.

The decline in tourism was evident as hotels, hostels, and private accommodations across the island remained closed, with beaches, shops, and attractions attracting few international visitors. The situation was exacerbated by a preexisting crisis caused by additional U.S. sanctions and a failed internal financial reform, which contributed to inflation.

In January, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a radical energy embargo on Cuba, further intensifying the pressure on the country's political and economic model. This, combined with the effects of other U.S. sanctions and the aforementioned financial reform, led to the suspension of contracts with major hotel chains like Meliá, Iberostar, and Royalton, as well as the withdrawal of payment gateways from Visa and Mastercard.

Major airlines, including World2Fly, Air France, Turkish Airlines, and Iberia, had already suspended flights to Cuba following the government's decision to prohibit planes from refueling on the island. In 2019, Cuba had received approximately 4.3 million tourists, and the travel industry had become a crucial economic engine, generating annual revenues of over $3 billion.

Written by urgent.news from Winnipeg Free Press's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at winnipegfreepress.com →

More in World

South Korea’s highly competitive private education system is being blamed for a sharp decline in the country’s birth rate. According to a report released by the Korea Institute of Population Research, a private education system that emphasizes out-of-school private academies, known as “hagwons”, cram schools and personal tutoring has resulted in a 28 percent decline in the country’s total fertility rate. The institute’s research showed that the more that parents invest in private education, the fewer children they have. The total fertility rate, which is the average number of children a woman would have in her lifetime, stood at 1. 19 in 2020, far below the 2.1 rate considered to be the level needed to maintain a stable population. South Korea’s total fertility rate has been falling steadily over the past 30 years and in 2020 it hit a record low. The low birth rate has been attributed to a combination of factors, including a changing social culture and the rising costs of child-rearing. The report suggested that the country’s competitive education system, which emphasizes private education, discourages people from having children. The report also said that investments in private education are concentrated in areas with high real estate values, which tend to have lower birth rates. The institute recommended that the government take steps to reform the education system and reduce the burden of private education costs on parents. The government has already introduced measures to reduce the role of private academies and encourage public education. However, experts say that more needs to be done to address the problem. “The government needs to take a comprehensive approach to address the issue of low birth rates,” said an expert. “It’s not just about reducing the costs of private education, but also about changing the social culture and values that discourage people from having children.”

More from Tuesday 1 September →