Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Women only accounted for 26% of hires in jobs with AI skills—and they could be missing out on a $100K salary difference

Women are up against a “triple penalty” when it comes to landing high-level lucrative AI roles, new LinkedIn data shows.

Women only accounted for 26% of hires in jobs with AI skills—and they could be missing out on a $100K salary difference

Women have been vastly underrepresented in AI jobs, accounting for just 26% of hires, compared to their 50% representation in non-AI roles. The gender gap in AI roles has led to a significant salary difference, with AI jobs offering an average of $177,000 per year, while non-AI roles pay around $80,000. This disparity is even more pronounced in higher-level positions.

Women hold only 13% of tech-related C-suite positions in AI companies globally, and make up just 20% of head of AI roles, 26% of director of AI roles, and 18% of member of technical staff roles. These positions typically pay $236,000, $300,000, and $245,000 per year, respectively. Women's presence is even lower at the top levels, with a 15% wider gap in leadership roles compared to less senior positions.

The report suggests that this gap, known as the "Triple Penalty," includes disadvantages in leadership roles, AI jobs, and working at AI companies. Despite concerns about AI negatively impacting women's careers, the data shows that women are 22% less likely to use AI at work, yet they are less likely to land high-paying AI roles.

Addressing these "Triple Penalty" barriers is crucial to ensure women don't get left behind in the AI-driven economy.

Written by urgent.news from Fortune's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fortune.com →

More in AI

More from Monday 31 August →