Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Energieversorgung: „Die USA haben durch ihre LNG-Lieferungen einen mächtigen Erpressungshebel“

Deutschland hängt zunehmend von US-Flüssiggas ab. Aber was wären die Folgen, wenn Washington der Bundesrepublik den Gashahn abdreht? Experten warnen – und sehen ein zweites Risiko.

Original German Read in English

Energieversorgung: „Die USA haben durch ihre LNG-Lieferungen einen mächtigen Erpressungshebel“

The United States has become a powerful tool of coercion in European gas supply through its liquefied natural gas (LNG) deliveries, warns energy experts. Andreas Goldthau, a professor at the University of Erfurt and director of the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, states that the US has a potent leverage in Europe by providing LNG to the continent.

Jacopo Pepe, an energy expert at the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), highlights significant risks in this scenario, such as causing a price shock if US LNG deliveries are restricted. Restricting or increasing the price of US LNG deliveries in the event of a political conflict could lead to enormous extra costs, Pepe adds.

The new gas supply model's resilience will be tested in the upcoming winter. Since the Russian attack on Ukraine in February 2022, Germany's gas supply has changed fundamentally, with the reliance on LNG deliveries from the US increasing significantly. The global gas market is tense due to disputes over the Hormuz Strait, with one-fifth of global LNG trade passing through this narrow passage.

Primarily, LNG tankers from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are required to pass through this passage. The situation in Germany is further complicated by the low gas reservoir levels, which are notably below average. Experts fear that, at the end of the winter, a significant additional demand for LNG deliveries could arise due to depleted reserves.

Germany relies heavily on LNG from the US, accounting for 90 percent of its LNG imports. The problem lies in the fact that the Americans have repeatedly demonstrated since President Donald Trump's administration that they view energy exports as a political tool. Loyle Campbell of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik (DGAP) states that it is "absolutely certain that the US will use energy exports as a lever to enforce political objectives."

The increased significance of the US in Europe's gas supply, particularly in Germany, is striking. Last year, 57% of Europe's liquefied natural gas imports came from the US, which is a quarter of the total gas consumption. Germany even relied on 90% of its liquefied natural gas from the US. The Ecologic Institute, the Dutch Clingendael Institute, and the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) had already published a study in early 2023, critically examining the growing dominance of the US in LNG supply to Europe.

The study warns that the EU risks replacing its historical dependence on Russian gas and oil with a new energy dependency on the US. Despite the US Ministry of Economy dismissing these criticisms regularly, it points out that there are several countries offering LNG. Unlike pipeline gas deliveries, new sources of supply can be more easily accessed.

Algeria, Nigeria, and Qatar are mentioned as alternative large LNG exporters. However, without US LNG, it would not work. The US is the world's largest LNG producer, ahead of Qatar. In all scenarios, gas traders are currently dependent on American liquefied gas, which plays a very important role, according to Klaus Müller, president of the Federal Network Agency.

The dominance of the US must be acknowledged, as US LNG is a critical factor in the energy supply. While the possibility that the US could use gas as a weapon against Europe to coerce the latter is not out of thin air, Andreas Goldthau points out that US energy companies can easily find other buyers worldwide if they cannot supply Europe anymore.

In the past, concerns about Germany and Europe's dependence on US LNG deliveries being problematic have been often dismissed with the argument that LNG deliveries from the US are delivered by various international private companies, which ensures that the deliveries remain free from US political influence. However, the past has shown that there are concerns about Germany's and Europe's dependence on US LNG deliveries.

Written by urgent.news from Handelsblatt's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at handelsblatt.com →

More in World

A small "mountain" at the tip of the smoke, the horrors seen by the rescue team. What happened in the fire that killed 44 people. 今月29日、京都市伏見区の住宅街で火事がありました。木造の建物が密集したエリアで、炎が広がりました。消防によりますと、火事のあと44人が亡くなりました。けがをした人も10人以上います。 On the 29th of this month, there was a fire in a residential area of Fushimi-ku, Kyoto. The fire spread in an area where wooden buildings were densely packed. According to the fire department, 44 people died in the fire. More than 10 people were also injured. 火事のあと、京都市は、近くに住む人たちを避難させました。応援に来た救助隊は、煙の先に高さが3mぐらいの山のようなものがあるのを見つけました。燃えた建物の下敷きになって、動くことができないでいた人たちがいたからです。 After the fire, the city of Kyoto evacuated people living nearby. Rescue teams that came to support the effort found a mountain-like object, about 3 meters high, at the tip of the smoke. This was because people were trapped under the burned buildings and were unable to move. 救助隊は、1つ1つの建物の下にいる人たちを助けようとしました。建物の下にいる人たちは、火がついたあと、逃げることができなくて、部屋の中に隠れていたと考えられています。 The rescue team tried to help the people under each building. It is believed that the people under the buildings were unable to escape after the fire started and hid inside their rooms. 火事の原因はわかっていません。京都市は、火事のあと、近くの建物の調査をしました。そして30日、この建物は法律で決まっている防火の規則を守っていなかったことがわかりました。 The cause of the fire is not known. The city of Kyoto investigated nearby buildings after the fire. On the 30th, it was found that this building did not comply with the fire prevention regulations stipulated by law. 近くに住む60歳ぐらいの男性は「火事のあと、しばらくはこの場所に近づくことができませんでした。火事の前に、建物の火の始まりを止めるような設備が必要だったと思います」と話していました。 A man in his 60s who lives nearby said, "After the fire, I couldn't approach this place for a while. I think that equipment to prevent the spread of fire was necessary before the fire."

More from Monday 31 August →