Transparency matters
These shows may suspended accounts, but the process needs transparency.
Transparency in banking processes is of utmost importance, especially when public funds are involved. A recent incident involving Bank Mandiri freezing a bank account belonging to a protest coordinator less than a week before their planned demonstration has sparked widespread criticism and concern. The account in question contained donations intended to support protesters demanding the seizure of assets from corruption convicts.
The freeze raised questions about the bank's credibility and the legality of such actions, with many calling for a boycott of the bank. Bank Mandiri initially apologized and claimed the freeze was due to a request from law enforcement, but did not disclose the agency involved or provide further details. It was later revealed that the Jakarta Police made the request, stating it was to investigate potential fundraising issues under the 2010 anti-money laundering law.
However, the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) denied any involvement in the account freeze. The incident highlights the potential for banking powers to be used as a tool to restrict freedom of expression, particularly concerning the timing of the freeze which occurred shortly before the demonstration.
Written by urgent.news from The Jakarta Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
