Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Provinces, You Can't Even Move There to Live [Except Seoul]

Translated from Korean Read in Korean

A recent debate has arisen surrounding the government's plan to relocate public agencies to rural areas. Many see the phrase "prefer rural over relocation" as an expression of frustration among employees who lack basic living and cultural facilities in rural areas. This opposition led the government to delay the announcement until October, instead of the originally planned September.

The primary objective of agency relocation is to alleviate overcrowding in the capital and promote national balanced development. While the government supports increasing job opportunities and industrial ecosystems in rural areas, they question the effectiveness and efficiency of this approach due to the potential hardships faced by employees, such as childcare, education, and spouses' job struggles. Some even argue that regional consolidation may exacerbate the concentration of development in the capital.

There are differing opinions within regions as well. Proponents of relocation in certain local governments are actively pursuing various strategies, including dedicated organizations, political cooperation, and financial support, to attract talent. However, there are concerns that Gyeonggi-do might be overlooked, especially after the introduction of comprehensive incentives by Gangwon-do. Inside Gyeonggi-do, the approach to relocation varies between innovation hubs like Wonju and newer cities like Chuncheon and Gangneung.

While some smaller local governments view this as merely a social gathering or an opportunity to observe others, those who have lived in Seoul for two decades or more and are returning to their hometowns generally support agency relocation, even if they wouldn't choose to move themselves. However, the concern that relocation could weaken national competitiveness, given that 1st round agency transfers were not as effective as expected, remains valid.

Nonetheless, the expectation of regional revitalization through this process is difficult to dismiss. Locals in areas without comfortable living conditions often express frustration and even resentment towards those who "prefer" the capital.

Written by urgent.news from Hankyoreh's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at hani.co.kr →

More in World

Govt Struggles with Balancing Act Over U.S. Sanctions on ICC, Faces International Criticism

The government is in a difficult position after the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump announced new sanctions against International Criminal Court President Tomoko Akane.

  • Japanese government balances rule of law with U.S. alliance
  • U.S. sanctions on ICC President Tomoko Akane criticized internationally
  • Japan's Foreign Minister Funakoshi met with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Landau

Iceland Rejects Resuming EU Membership Talks Reykjavik, March 9 (Yonhap) -- Icelanders on Saturday voted against resuming European Union membership talks, dealing a major blow to the government's bid to join the EU. In a non-binding referendum, nearly 60 percent of Icelanders rejected the government's plan to resume talks with Brussels, which had been stalled since 2008. The government had sought to revive the talks, launched in 2005, in a bid to join the EU and adopt the euro. But the move was fiercely opposed by many Icelanders, who feared it would undermine their country's sovereignty and way of life. The referendum was called after the government failed to win parliamentary approval for its EU bid. Prime Minister Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson said he would step down if voters rejected the plan. He said he would respect the outcome of the referendum and begin consultations with other parties on the way forward. The government had argued that EU membership would help Iceland recover from a severe economic crisis in 2008. It also said membership would provide Iceland with greater access to European markets. But opponents argued that membership would lead to higher prices, especially for fish products, and threaten Iceland's rich fishing resources. They also feared that Iceland would lose control over its natural resources. The tiny North Atlantic island nation of 320,000 people has a unique culture and way of life. It has a highly developed economy and is known for its stunning landscapes and hot springs. Iceland has been negotiating with the EU since 2005 but put talks on hold in 2008 after a severe economic crisis hit the country. The government had hoped that joining the EU would help it recover from the crisis. But the talks stalled and Iceland's application was frozen. In 2012, Iceland's then-prime minister, Johanna Sigurdardottir, signed an agreement to restart talks. But the move was opposed by many Icelanders, who took to the streets in protest. The issue has been highly divisive in Iceland, with many fearing that EU membership would undermine the country's unique culture and way of life.

More from Sunday 30 August →