Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

How drones are revolutionizing the search for lost pets

One Southern California city is using a $17,000 drone that utilizes lasers and thermal imaging to pinpoint animal heat signatures over large areas.

In Southern California's Orange County, a lost terrier was found using a drone in a matter of minutes. The drone, equipped with lasers and thermal imaging, spotted the small dog in a carpool lane and guided ground units to its location.

This marks a significant shift from traditional lost pet searches, which once took days or weeks. Kyle Werner, an animal control officer for Mission Viejo, shared that the drone transformed their approach, moving from passive waiting to active searching.

The technology was instrumental in another rescue involving a dog named Lana. Senior officer JR Stewart explained that dense brush had obscured the dog's whereabouts, making visual detection impossible. However, the drone was able to identify the dog's heat signature and direct Stewart to its location.

The drone also played a crucial role in a search last year for a skittish dog named Josie, whose owner was able to find her more easily with the drone's assistance. The owner's calm demeanor allowed the dog to approach her, resulting in a touching reunion captured on camera.

The drone, costing nearly $17,000, was funded through private donations. Werner expressed his belief that the investment was invaluable, stating that the technology has already garnered interest from other agencies. He emphasized that the ultimate goal is reuniting lost pets with their families, a process he regards as priceless.

Written by urgent.news from CBS News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at cbsnews.com →

More in Tech

Four reviewers told me the one thing I couldn't fix by myself

What happens when you submit a solo open-source project to academic peer review: the reviews were good, the paper was rejected, and the gap they found was the one I had no way to close on my own.

  • Four reviewers found evaluation too narrow and self-conducted
  • Protocol's effectiveness tested only on author's hardware
  • Author acknowledges need for independent evaluators' input

Git Said It Succeeded. The State Said Otherwise.

I keep finding git behaviours the same way: set up the case, run the command, then check the state I actually cared about instead of trusting the success message.

  • Git's success message may not reflect true outcome
  • GitHub's mergeability doesn't guarantee reviewer's data is up-to-date
  • --autosquash can leave fixup commits in history despite success

HLD: Twitter / X

Design a social media platform where users post tweets, follow each other, and see a timeline of tweets from accounts they follow.

  • Twitter rebranded to X
  • Home timeline generated via hybrid fan-out approach
  • System designed to handle 500 million tweets daily

More from Sunday 30 August →